

Mehran Karimi Nasseri (مهران کریمی ناصری [meɦˈrɔːn kʲæriːˈmiː nɔːseˈriː]), (born 1942), also known as Sir, Alfred Mehran (including the comma), is an Iranian refugee who lived in the departure lounge of Terminal One in Charles de Gaulle Airport from 8 August 1988 until July 2006, when he was hospitalized for an unspecified ailment. His autobiography has been published as a book and he may have been the basis for the movie The Terminal.
Early life
Nasseri was born in the Anglo-Persian Oil Company settlement located in Masjed Soleiman, Iran. His father was an Iranian physician working for the company. Nasseri stated that his mother was a nurse from Scotland working in the same place.[1] He arrived in the United Kingdom in September 1973, to take a three-year course in Yugoslav studies at the University of Bradford
Current position
Nasseri was expelled from Iran in 1977 for protests against the Shah and after a long battle, involving applications in several countries, was awarded refugee status by the United Nations High Commission for refugees in Belgium. This permitted residence in any European country.
Having one British parent, he decided to settle in the UK in 1986, but en route to there in 1988, he had his briefcase containing his papers stolen in Paris.[2] Despite this setback, he boarded the plane for London but was promptly returned to France when he failed to present a passport to British immigration. He was initially arrested by the French, but then released as his entry to the airport was legal and he had no country of origin to be returned to and his residency at Terminal 1 began.
His case was later taken on by French human rights lawyer Christian Bourget. In 1992, French courts ruled that, having entered the country legally, he could not be expelled from the airport, but it could not grant him permission to enter France.
Attempts were then made to have new documents issued from Belgium, but the authorities there would only do so if Naserri presented himself in person. However, under Belgian law a refugee who voluntarily leaves a country that has accepted him cannot return. In 1995, the Belgian authorities granted permission for him to return, but only if he agreed to live there under supervision of a social worker. Naserri refused this on the ground of wanting to enter the UK as originally intended.[2]
Nasseri's life at the airport ended in July 2006 when he was hospitalized and his sitting place dismantled. Towards the end of January 2007, he left the hospital and was looked after by the airport's branch of the French Red Cross; he was lodged for a few weeks in a hotel close to the airport. On March 6, 2007, he transferred to an Emmaus charity reception centre in Paris's twentieth arrondissement. As of 2008, he continues to live in a Paris shelter.
Life in Terminal 1
During his eighteen year long stay at Terminal 1 in the Charles de Gaulle Airport, Nasseri would have his luggage at his side, and be either reading, writing in his diary, or studying economics.[3] He would receive food and newspapers from employees of the airport
Documentaries and fictionalizations
Nasseri's story provided the inspiration for the 1994 Tombés du ciel French film, starring Jean Rochefort, internationally released under the Lost in Transit title. The short story, The Fifteen-Year Layover by Michael Paterniti and published in GQ and The Best American Non-Required Reading, chronicles Nasseri's existence. Alexis Kouros made a documentary about him, Waiting for Godot at De Gaulle in 2000. Glen Luchford made the Here to Where mockumentary in 2001, also featuring Nasseri.
Nasseri was reportedly the inspiration behind the 2004 movie The Terminal; however, neither publicity materials, nor the DVD "special features" nor the film's website mentions Nasseri's plight as an inspiration for the film. Despite this, in September 2003, The New York Times noted that Steven Spielberg bought the rights to his life story as the basis for The Terminal.[4] The Guardian indicates that Spielberg's Dreamworks production company paid $250,000 to Nasseri for rights to his story and report that as of 2004 he carried a poster advertising Spielberg's film draping his suitcase next to his bench. Nasseri was reportedly excited about The Terminal, but it was unlikely that he would ever have a chance to see it.[1]
Nasseri's story was also the inspiration for the award winning contemporary opera Flight by British composer Jonathan Dove[5].
Merhan Karimi Nasseri has spent 16 years living in Charles de Gaulle airport. Now Steven Spielberg's Terminal has catapulted him to international stardom - but casts little light on who he really is. And Sir Alfred, as he calls himself, isn't too sure either. Paul Berczeller, who spent a year with Nasseri, set out to unravel the mysteryPaul Berczeller The Guardian, Monday 6 September 2004 Merhan Karimi Nasseri: Forever delayed
I first saw him, many years ago now, staring out with an uncanny gaze of blank intensity from the pages of a newspaper. Seated alone on a bench, immune to the endless motion of the airport around him, there was a curious inscrutability to his slight, balding yet dignified countenance. He looked like some unlikely cross between a Zen master and Chaplin's Tramp. He had these amazing long brows, as dark as his hooded eyes, and a small, perfectly groomed moustache perched on top of his upper lip. It was like a caricature of a face, five charcoal marks on a canvas. But strangely noble, too.
The Terminal
Release: 2004
Country: USA
Cert (UK): 12A
Runtime: 128 mins
Directors: Steven Spielberg
Cast: Catherine Zeta-Jones, Chi McBride, Diego Luna, Stanley Tucci, Tom Hanks
His name was Merhan Karimi Nasseri though he called himself "Sir Alfred". He lived in a lost dimension of absurd bureaucratic entanglement. That is to say, on a bench in Terminal One of the Charles de Gaulle International Airport, and he had lived there since 1988. For a series of insanely complicated reasons, the Iranian-born refugee was now a man without a country - or any other documented, internationally accepted identity status. Alfred couldn't leave France because he did not have papers; he couldn't enter France because he did not have papers. The authorities told him to wait in the airport lounge while they sorted the paradox out. That he did - for years and years.
Then one day, I heard that Alfred had finally been given his papers. He was free to go anywhere in the world he wished. Except now it seemed he didn't want to leave the airport after all. It was the only home - the only past - he had left.
27 comments:
It is too long.I couldn't read all the passage(cause my eyes) and i couldn't understand all of.it is a difficult text for me but it is a general knowladge so thanks for this sharing miss tokatlı:>
it will be useful one day.
ı think the man was very lucky.if he had been in turkey,he wouldn't have lived in an airport.security guards don't let to him stay a bench so this story is interesting.
Ok,it's just been shortened!Have a quick look and thank to çağla:-)Well,the others,let's hear your voice???
thats was an interesting read...great job...
If i were him i would destroy airport. Cuz everybody guides their destiny. Nobody can say anything
Skars I have a question for you,what kind of a word is 'read'?
Efecim,what o sophisticated comment that is!!
As for me Nasssery's face is funny. Because of his bald head and short mustache. His past also interesting. But I didn't understand that, how did he live in an airport for 16 years......
Read is a verb....if that is what you meant by a kind of word...
Is anything wrong with the usage?
No comment
We are used to watch film which are about surviving in wild life, but it is new adventures of human beings in modern world... and i bet,she didnt date with a girl like catherine zeta jones :-P
i am really wondering why he was out of immigration laws , as i know an migrant could live in society if its complient was accepted.
interesting life
he stayed 16 years at the airport. if ı were him ı couldnt stay at the airport. ı want watch the film. ı think this is interesting life experience
I think , to live in 16 years in airport was very difficult . I dont want to live airport . Because there aren't any suitable things . For example , he slept on the bench . and this is very unconfortable . There aren't any delicious food . All the time he ate to Mcdonals . This is not so good . At the end ı dont want to live airport like an Sir , Alfred . I must be careful in the USA for not losing my paper . If ı lost it , ı would live airport and this is my last choosen :D:D
finally ı remembered my password and post my comment .
thank you Mine Teacher and we want to see the film . Good night everyone :D
No comment is not a valid comment in this case Hüseyincim..Be more creative:-)
Yunus why don't you search about that issue on the net and share what you find out with us here?We are looking forward to hearing from you!
I will try my best to get you watch the film,if I can find the dvd,we will watch it the other week together..
In my opinion , 16 years live in airport is very diffucult and nonsense.Regardless of case, authorities must have found solution.I think so Sir ,Alfred Mehran should have agreed live in Belgium under supervision of a social worker , instead of living in airport.If I were Sir,Alfred Mehran,I absolutely couldn't stand.Eventually this event is really different and difficult.I look forward to watch its film .
it is interesting life.But if I were him,I wouldun't stay that airport.Because the life is very bad in the big place without home.So I try to find any other solution.Live for 16 years as this state it is disgusting.We want to watch film .We12 CLASS .Please teacher.I love you mine teacher it is perfect:D
when i read the passage i was shocked.because the original story is so different than film that stimulate tom hanks.the terminal was so enjoyable and funny but the real story wasn't funny.the terimal might be fun watching everyone directed.but in the end the real story i was happy for Mehran Karrimi Nasseri:)he probably miss his wife and child,if i were you i can say clearly i can't stand:)
its a really interesting life experience.but i don't want to be like him.because 16 years too long for me.i am not patient so i can't live in an airport for 16 years.i wacthed this film but i don't remember clearly it.i want to watch it again :)
what an unlucky person ı have ever seen. this is really difficult situation. if ı were him doupless,ı would stay . when it comes to you, you have to behave like Nassari. he is really forbearing person.
ı really covet to his forbearance:)
it is very bad situation for him.but after that this situation become luck for him..because he earned money because of his bad situation.i think it is very bad situation even he earned money..
its the most different situation i have ever heard.he lived there very long time and he could stand this boring life.if ı were him i couldn't do it..i congratulate him =)
our lives may change at one time we don't expect.Nasssery's life is interesting example for this.this story is very woeful.Nasssery is the most patient person i have ever heard in my life.as soon as i want to watch this film..
All comments are similar:S I wanted mine to be different
As a person who was stuck at the airport about 4 hours, it is not hard to understand how it would be sorrow for him to live in airport 16 years..
Truly, it is really annoying being blocked from real world..
deepnote: dating with girls is highly possible :-P
Post a Comment